# Review summary

This summary preserves actionable findings without provider transcripts, local paths or usage records.

Fable reviewed the application and screenshots read-only before the Kimi interface revision. Kimi supplied the interface revision. Subsequent native verification corrected record-table field flattening, contrast calculation and narrow-phone toolbar overflow. Those corrections are credited separately from Kimi's design work.

The application uses established components for optimization, records, calendar interaction, imports and history. It has working proposal, review and apply workflows. These observations do not establish suitability for live camp operations.

## Remaining product gaps

- Transport remains a small conflict-checked trip model, not a complete transport workflow.
- Attendance does not remove campers from assignments automatically.
- Elective preferences may need explicit entry; placement outcomes depend on the available choices, capacities and qualifications.
- Editing hard rules can leave existing assignments needing repair. A clear exception-repair workflow is the strongest next product improvement.
- Source-linked notes are separate reference records. They do not automatically attach to affected workflows or become solver rules.
- Long operational pages still require scrolling on a phone.

An earlier review questioned whether staff unavailable during an overlapping period could be assigned. Existing validation and negative tests cover that case, so it is not retained as a confirmed defect.

The package verification report separates fresh-install checks from previously recorded browser and design reviews. The kit is a local prototype using fictional data.